Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

348 RUSSELL V. STATE [240 RUSSELL V. STATE 5144 399 S. W. 2d 268 Opinion delivered February 21, 1966 1. CRIMINAL LAWAPPEAL & ERRORREVIEW.—In the absence of motion for new trial, the record was examined and no error having been found on its face, the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed. Appeal from Pope Circuit Court, Wiley W. Bean, Judge ; affirmed. No brief filed for Appellant. Bruce Belinett, Atty. General, Fletcher Jackson, Asst. Atty. General, for appellee. 0s110 COBB, Justice. This appellant was convicted of grand larceny and sentenced to four years imprisonment. The record contains no motion for new trial in the Circuit Court. The established practice of this court in situations of this kind is to examine the record to determine whether there is error on the face of the record. Barnhill v. State, 239 Ark. 168, 388 S. W. 2d 99 ; Whelehon v. State, 233 Ark. 229, 343 S. W. 2d 563. We have made an examination of the record in this case and find no error on the face of same. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.