• YOUNG V. YOU NG. 929 YOUNG V. YOUN G. 3396 384 S. W. 2d 469 Supplemental opinion on denial of Petition for Rehearing delivered January 18, 1965. EQUITY— JURISDICTION, EXTENT OF.—Chancery court, having issued an injunction, has continuing jurisdiction to modify the same on proper showing. ED. F. MCFADDIN, Associate Justice (Additional Opinion on Rehearing). In his petition for rehearing Mr. Young calls attention to a matter which was contained in his original brief, but which we did not discuss in our Opinion of becember 14, 1964. The Chancery decree permanently enjoined Mr. Young from selling, during Mrs. Young's lifetime, the property at No. 3121 Olive Street in .Pine Bluff, where. Mrs. Young is now living. Mr. Young claims that this property is in.a section fast becoming commercial, and that he should be allowed to furnish MrS. Young a home for her lifetime at some other suitable location and then be allowed to sell the property at 3121 Olive Street. Of course, Mr. and Mrs. Young may negotiate between themselves, if they so desire, as to another suitable home for Mrs. Young for her lifetime. Should they be unable to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement, thes.
Mr. Young, if he should think that Mrs. Young was being arbitrary in the matter, would be free to ask the Jefferson Chancery Court to hear the dispute and decide as to whether Mrs. Young should be required to accept another suitable home for her lifetime in lieu of the present one. The Chancery Court which granted the injunction in the first instance is always empowered to modify it. With this explanation, the petition for rehearing is denied. HARRIS, C. J., hot participating. (Original opinion delivered December 14, 1964, P. 795.)
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.