82 CASES IN THE SUPREME COURT LITTLE ROCK, Jan'y MIL
■•■■■■■-■■,..,
ELLIS
we, BROWN and MANN 1/82. O vrId. f Mi ley, 13/415. tchell v. Con-ELLIS against BROWN AND MANN. ERROR to Lawrence Circuit Court. A writ of error not directed to any particular Clerk cannot be amended. The writ of error in this case was directed as follows: "State of Arkansas, etc. To the Clerk of the Circuit Court of — Greeting: TAYLOR, for the defendants in error, moved to dismiss the case " for irregularity,.on the ground that there is no writ of error, and "that the paper filed as such is not directed to the Clerk of the Cir-" cuit Court of any county in this State." FOWLER, contra, moved at the same time to amend the writ of error. Per Curium: This is a motion to quash a writ of error because the name of the county to which it ought to have been directed, is not specified. A motion to amend the writ, was also made at the same time. We are of opinion that there is nothing to amend by. The motion to dismisa must be sustained,
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.