338 SALES V. STATE [291 Cite as 291 Ark. 338 (1987) Derek SALES v. STATE of Arkansas CR 86-134 724 S.W.2d 469 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 2, 1987 1. CRIMINAL LAW — RAPE — SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE. — The victim's statement alone is sufficient to sustain a conviction for rape.
ARK.] SALES V. STATE 339 Cite as 291 Ark. 338 (1987) 2. CRIMINAL LAW — AGGRAVATED ROBBERY, BREAKING AND ENTERING, AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT — SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE. — The victim's eye witness account of all of the essential elements of the charges of aggravated robbery, breaking and entering, and false imprisonment in the first degree was sufficient to sustain each separate verdict. Appeal from Ashley Circuit Court; Jerry Mazzanti, Judge; affirmed. Don E. Glover, for appellant. Steve Clark, Att'y Gen., by: Robert A. Ginnaven, III, Asst. Att'y Gen., for appellee. JOHN I. PURTLE, Justice. The appellant was convicted of rape, aggravated robbery, breaking and entering and false imprisonment in the first degree. His respective sentences were forty (40), twenty (20), six (6) and ten (10) years. The forty and twenty year sentences were to run consecutively and the six and ten year sentences were concurrent with the others. This appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We find that there was substantial evidence to support the convictions and affirm. The prosecutrix testified that the appellant broke into her house and, by use of a gun, raped her and took money from her boyfriend's billfold. The appellant then forced her to drive him to another city. The appellant's defense was that he did not do any of the crimes charged. He did admit to having sexual intercourse with the victim, but he claimed that she consented. [1, 2] The victim's statement alone is sufficient to sustain a conviction for rape. Hamm v. State, 214 Ark. 171, 214 S.W.2d 917 (1948). In addressing the sufficiency of the evidence concerning the other convictions, we have many times held that we will affirm if there is any substantial evidence to support the convictions. Fountain v. State, 273 Ark. 457,620 S.W.2d 936 (1981). A physician testified that he found evidence consistent with that of sexual intercourse; tests revealed that the bedspread in the victim's house had semen on it and the victim gave an eye witness account of all essential elements to the charges. Her testimony alone was sufficient to sustain each separate verdict. Clay v. State, 290 Ark. 54, 716 S.W.2d 751 (1986).
Affirmed.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.