ARK.] FRETWELL V. STATE 221 Cite as 290 Ark. 221 (1986) Bobby FRETWELL v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 85-208 718 S.W.2d 109 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 27, 1986 1. ATTORNEY & CLIENT — CRIMINAL CASE — ATTORNEY MUST REPRESENT CLIENT THROUGH APPEAL UNLESS PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW. — Ark. R. Crim. P. 36.26 provides that an attorney will represent a convicted defendant through appeal to the appellate court, unless permitted by the trial court or the appellate court to withdraw. 2. ATTORNEY & CLIENT — RIGHT TO COUNSEL ENDS AFTER DIRECT APPEAL. — The right to counsel ends after the direct appeal of the original criminal trial is completed, and there is no obligation for counsel to continue representing the defendant in postconviction proceedings which are undertaken in the supreme court after appeal. 3. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — POSTCONVICTION RELIEF — POSTCON-VICTION PROCEEDINGS ARE CIVIL — NO RIGHT TO COUNSEL. — As postconviction proceedings are civil rather than criminal in nature, there is clearly no constitutional right to appointment of counsel to prepare a petition under Rule 37, and no exception will be made in a capital case. Motion to be Relieved as Counsel; granted. Motion for Appointment of Counsel; denied.
222 FRETWELL V. STATE [290 Cite as 290 Ark. 221 (1986) William J. Valek, for appellant. No response. PER CURIAM. Bobby Fretwell was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. On May 19, 1986, we affirmed. Fretwell v. State, 289 Ark. 91, 708 S.W.2d 630 (1986). Fretwell, through his attorney William Velek, subsequently sought and was granted a stay of execution so that he could proceed under our postconviction rule, Rule 37. Velek now asks to be relieved as counsel and moves for appointment of counsel to represent Fretwell in his pursuit of relief under Rule 37. We find good cause to relieve Velek as counsel, but deny the request for appointment of another attorney. [1-3] The Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 36.26, provides that an attorney will represent a convicted defendant through appeal to this court, unless permitted by the trial court or this court to withdraw. The right to counsel ends after the direct appeal of the original criminal trial is completed, Douglas v. People of State of California, 372 U.S. 353 (1963), and there is no obligation for counsel to continue representing the defendant in postconviction proceedings which are undertaken in this court after appeal. See Noble v. Sigler, 351 F.2d 673 (8th Cir. 1965), cert. denied 385 U.S. 853 (1966). As postconviction proceedings are civil rather than criminal in nature, there is clearly no constitutional right to appointment of counsel to prepare a petition under Rule 37. See Dyer v. State, 258 Ark. 494, 527 S.W.2d 622 (1975). We will not make an exception in a capital case. Motion to be relieved as counsel granted; motion for appointment of counsel denied.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.