Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

610 UNITED ORDER OF GOOD SAMARITANS V. [180 GRIGSBY. UNITED ORDER OF GOOD SAMARITANS V. GRIGSBY. Opinion delivered December 9, 1929. 1. APPEAL AND ERRORINSTRUCTED VARDICT. Where both parties requested a directed verdict, and neither requested additional instructions, the only question presented on appeal from a judgment on a directed verdict is whether there is any substantial evidence to support the verdict and judgment. 2. TIMEPAYMENT OF DIJES.—Where a fraternal insurance company's constitution and by-laws required the payment of dues "on or before the first of the month, with ten days of grace," insured had ten full days after the first day of the month to pay dues, and where she did so on the llth day, it was sufficient. 3. INSURANCETIME OF PAYMENT OF DUES.--A provision in a fraternal insurance company's constitution and by-laws for payment of dues on or before the first of the month, with ten days of grace, being more favorable to insured than a conflicting provision requiring payment by the tenth of the month, should be applied and the beneficiaries allowed to recover on the policy, where insured paid the dues on the llth of the month. -
A RK.] UNITED ORDER OF GOOD SAMARITANS v. 611 GRIGSBY. Appeal from Phillips Circuit Court; W. D. Davenport, Judge ; affirmed. A. D. Whitehead, for appellant. W. G. Dinning, for appellee. HUMPHREYS, J. This is an appeal from a judgment for $300 rendered by the circuit court of Phillips County against appellant upon an insurance policy issued by it upon the life of Annie Grigsby, in which appellees were the beneficiaries. Appellant filed an answer to the complaint, denying liability under the policy upon the ground that the insured, Annie Grigsby, died during the time that she was automatically suspended from the order for failure to pay her July, 1927, dues, on or before the 10th day of said month, or within the time prescribed by the constitution and by-laws of the order. The cause was heard upon the pleadings and testimony introduced by the respective parties, at the conclusion of which each party requested an instructed verdict, and made no request for additional instructions. The court refused appellant's request, and instructed a verdict for appellee. The only question therefore presented by the appeal is whether there is any substantial evidence to support the verdict and consequent judgment. The insured died on August 1, 1927. She did not pay her July dues until July 11, 1927. The policy provided that the constitution and by-laws of appellant's order should be read together as a part of the contract. Appellant introduced §§ 7 and 10 of article 9 of the by-laws and constitution of tbe order to fix the status of the insured as a delinquent and a suspended member of the order at the time of her death. The sections are as f ollows "Section 7. If the dues are not received at the home office by the tenth of each month, policy is automatically lapsed and becomes null and void; should the member fail or refuse to pay any taxes or fines levied by the supreme, grand or subordinate colony, should sickness or
612 UNITED ORDER OF GOOD SAMARITANS V. [180 GRIGSBY. death occur after thirty days from the date said taxes were due, neither the supreme, grand or subordinate colony shall be liable for any benefits, and the certificate shall become absolutely null and void, although the endowments have been paid." "Section 10. If the dues are not paid by the 10th of the month due, the insured shall be automatically suspended, and in case of sickness or death neither the supreme, grand or subordinate colony shall be liable for any sum under the contract. Should the dues be paid, neither the insured nor the beneficiaries shall be entitled to any benefit, if sickness or death occurs before the expiration of thirty days ; also the subsequent payment of such arrears shall not entitle the insured or beneficiaries to auy benefits for sickness or death occurring during the period of such suspension." The section quoted, standing alone, under the construction placed upon similar provisions in fraternal insurance policies in the cases of United Order of Good Samaritans v. Thompson, 172 Ark. 884, 290 S. W. 965, and United Order of Good Samaritans v. Betts, 179 Ark. 203, 14 S. W. (2d) 1108, would relieve appellant of liability in this case ; but the sections do not stand alone in the policy in the case at bar. Appellee introduced in evidence the second paragraph of § 6, article 9, of the constitution and by-laws of the order, not called to our attention in the cases cited, if there was such a rule, which is as follows : "The dues are payable in advance, and must be paid on or before the first of the month, with ten days grace." This section applies to policies upon which monthly dues are payable, and means that the insured had ten full days after the first day of the month within which to pay her July dues. She paid the dues on July 11, within the period of the ten days grace allowed her under the clause last oinote d. If t here is confl; ct between this provisier and the sections first quoted, which there seems to be, the provisions most favorable to the insured should be
applied and the beneficiaries allowed to recover. Under our construction of the latter provision, the trial court's peremptory instruction in favor of appellee was correctly given. No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed. KIRBY, J., dissents.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.