Cite as 2010 Ark. App. 34 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CACR09-144 Opinion Delivered JANUARY 13, 2010 JUSTIN CHARLES TEAGUE APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, [NO. CR-05-1049D, CR-06-679] V. HONORABLE JAMES O. COX, JUDGE STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE REBRIEFING ORDERED; MOTION DENIED M. MICHAEL KINARD, Judge Appellant, Justin Charles Teague, appeals from the circuit court’s revocation of his suspended sentence. Appellant’s counsel has filed a no-merit brief and a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k). Due to substantial deficiencies in the addendum, we order rebriefing. On appeal, the appellant’s brief is required to contain an addendum which must include true and legible photocopies of the order, judgment, decree, ruling, letter opinion, or workers’ compensation commission opinion from which the appeal is taken, along with any other relevant pleadings, documents, or exhibits essential to an understanding of the case and the court’s jurisdiction on appeal. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8) (2009). All that is contained in appellant’s addendum is the judgment and commitment order entered after the revocation hearing. Notably absent from the addendum are the notice of appeal, the
Cite as 2010 Ark. App. 34 judgment and commitment orders in which appellant received suspended sentences, the terms and conditions of appellant’s suspended sentences, and the State’s petition or petitions to revoke. Pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(b)(3) (2009), we are notifying appellant’s counsel that he has thirty days from the date of this opinion to file a brief that is in compliance with Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8). The motion to withdraw as counsel is denied. Rebriefing ordered; motion denied. R OBBINS and GRUBER, JJ., agree. -2-
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.