Cite as 2011 Ark. App. 103 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CACR09-1302 RAYMOND YSEL BELL Opinion Delivered FEBRUARY 9, 2011 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FORT SMITH DISTRICT [NO. CR-2006-657] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE STEPHEN MERRILL APPELLEE TABOR, JUDGE MOTION DENIED; REBRIEFING ORDERED RITA W. GRUBER, Judge We previously ordered rebriefing of this case because counsel failed to comply with Rule 4-3(k) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. Bell v. State, 2010 Ark. App. 66. Counsel now has filed a substituted brief appealing Raymond Ysel Bell’s revocation of his suspended sentence for aggravated robbery. And again, pursuant to Anders v.California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and to Rule 4-3(k), counsel has filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is wholly without merit. Counsel has partially complied with our rebriefing order by summarizing evidence in support of the revocation and by discussing the court’s ruling on Bell’s “leading” objection. The substituted brief remains inadequate in other ways, however, and again we must order rebriefing. A no-merit brief that fails to address an adverse ruling does not satisfy the requirements of Rule 4-3(k)(1) and must be rebriefed. Sartin v. State, 2010 Ark. 16, 362
Cite as 2011 Ark. App. 103 S.W.3d 877; Bell, supra. Our review of the record reveals that the court sustained two relevancy objections by the State. These are merely examples of adverse rulings that should have been addressed in counsel’s brief, and we do not intend that counsel rely upon them as an exclusive list. We strongly encourage counsel, prior to filing another substituted brief, abstract, and addendum, to review our rules and avoid additional deficiencies. Once again, we direct counsel’s attention to the briefing requirements for no-merit appeals: The brief shall contain an argument section that consists of a list of all rulings adverse to the defendant made by the circuit court on all objections, motions and requests made by either party with an explanation as to why each adverse ruling is not a meritorious ground for reversal. The abstract and addendum of the brief shall contain, in addition to the other material parts of the record, all rulings adverse to the defendant made by the circuit court. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(k)(1) (2010). We express no opinion as to whether the new appeal should be on the merits or should be made pursuant to Anders, supra, and Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(k)(1). If a no-merit brief is filed, counsel’s motion and brief will be forwarded by the clerk to appellant so that, within thirty days, he again may raise any points he chooses in accordance with Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(k)(2). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied, and the case is remanded for rebriefing. Motion denied; rebriefing ordered. VAUGHT, C.J., and ABRAMSON, J., agree. -2-
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.