Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 202 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-16-1063 Opinion Delivered: April 5, 2017 CRYSTAL BUTLER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE UNION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 70JV-13-271] ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AND MINOR HONORABLE EDWIN KEATON, CHILDREN JUDGE APPELLEES AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED BART F. VIRDEN, Judge This is an appeal arising from the order of the Union County Circuit Court terminating appellant Crystal Butler’s parental rights to E.M.1, E.M.2, K.B., J.M., and K.A.B. Butler’s attorney has filed a no-merit brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel. On appeal, counsel contends that there are no meritorious grounds that could possibly support an appeal. In compliance with Linker–Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 359 Ark. 131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Rule 6-9(i) (2016) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, Butler’s counsel has examined the entire supplemented record for adverse rulings and has noted that, apart from the termination, there were no rulings adverse to Butler. Counsel has adequately discussed why there is no arguable merit to an appeal. Butler was provided a copy of her counsel’s brief and motion, and she exercised her
Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 202 right to file pro se points on appeal. Neither the Arkansas Department of Human Services nor the attorney ad litem filed a responsive brief. Having carefully examined the pro se points filed by Butler, the record, and the no-merit brief, we hold that Butler’s counsel has complied with the requirements for no-merit, parental-termination appeals and that the appeal is wholly without merit. Accordingly, by memorandum opinion, we affirm the termination of Butler’s parental rights to E.M.1, E.M.2, K.B., J.M., and K.A.B. In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 5-2(e). We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of Butler. Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted. GRUBER, C.J., and WHITEAKER, J., agree. Leah Lanford, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant. No response. 2
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.