Court of Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 460 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. E-16-248 Opinion Delivered October 5, 2016 VALUE STREAM COMMERCIAL APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS SERVICES, LLC BOARD OF REVIEW APPELLANT [NO. 2016-BR-00628] V. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, AND DICKIE OHLER APPELLEES APPEAL DISMISSED BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge Value Stream Commercial Services, LLC, a corporation, appeals from the Arkansas Board of Reviews 17 May 2016 decision affirming the Appeal Tribunal and finding that the claimant, Dickie Ohler, was entitled to benefits because he quit with good cause connected with the work. We dismiss due to lack of jurisdiction. On 2 June 2016, Value Stream filed its petition for appeal with this court. The petition was signed by Scott Lybrand, who is not a licensed attorney. It is well settled that corporations must be represented by licensed attorneys. Smithco Invs. of W. Memphis, Inc. v. Morgan Keegan & Co., 370 Ark. 477, 261 S.W.3d 454 (2007). Furthermore, our supreme court has held that when a party not licensed to practice law in this state attempts to represent the interests of others by submitting himself or herself to the jurisdiction of a court, those actions, such as the filing of pleadings, are a nullity. Id. Here, Lybrand is not an attorney 1
Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 460 and may not represent Value Stream in this case. Our caselaw makes it clear that invoking the process of a court of law constitutes the practice of law. Stephens Prod. Co. v. Bennett, 2015 Ark. App. 617. Because Lybrand was practicing law when he signed the petition, the petition is null and void. See id. As a result, we lack jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal. Appeal dismissed. ABRAMSON and KINARD, JJ., agree. 2
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.