Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 372 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CV-15-445 LAKESIA CHANDLER and JASMINE Opinion Delivered August 31, 2016 DAVIS APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM THE PHILLIPS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. CV-2011-209] WAL-MART STORES INC., L’OREAL HONORABLE RICHARD L. USA, INC., AND L’OREAL USA PROCTOR, JUDGE PRODUCTS, INC. APPELLEES AFFIRMED CLIFF HOOFMAN, Judge Appellants Lakesia Chandler and Jasmine Davis appeal from the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellees, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”); L’Oreal USA; and L’Oreal USA Products, Inc. (collectively, “L’Oreal”). On appeal, appellants argue that the circuit court erred by (1) ignoring evidence that was favorable to them; (2) granting summary judgment where questions of material fact remain as to the product’s defects and as to appellees’ liability, whether in strict liability or negligence; (3) granting summary judgment where questions of material fact remain as to their claims of deficient labeling; (4) granting summary judgment on their claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) and punitive damages; and (5) granting summary judgment on their remaining claims. We affirm. On June 15, 2011, Chandler, individually and as next friend to minor, Jasmine Davis, filed suit against Wal-Mart in connection with injuries that her thirteen-year-old daughter,
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.