Court of Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 14 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CR-14-509 Opinion Delivered January 14, 2015 FRANK BEMIS PLEDGER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE MILLER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 46CR-13-184] V. HONORABLE KIRK DOUGLAS JOHNSON, JUDGE STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE REBRIEFING ORDERED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge Appellant Frank Pledger was convicted by a Miller County jury of residential burglary and was sentenced as a habitual offender to forty years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Rule 4-3(k) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, Pledgers attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel on the ground that the appeal is wholly without merit. The motion is accompanied by an abstract, brief, and addendum purporting to list all adverse rulings and to explain why each adverse ruling is not a meritorious ground for reversal. However, we must deny counsels motion to withdraw because counsel has failed to abstract and address all rulings adverse to Pledger and has failed to submit an addendum that complies with the requirements of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals.
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 14 First, we note that our review of the record revealed that the trial court sustained the States objection to a statement made by defense counsel during closing argument. Counsel failed to abstract or address this adverse ruling. Under Rule 4-3(k)(1), before this court may grant counsels motion to withdraw, he must abstract and adequately explain why each adverse ruling is not a meritorious ground for reversal in his brief, and a failure to do so requires us to order rebriefing. Sartin v. State, 2010 Ark. 16, 362 S.W.3d 877; Gregory v. State, 2011 Ark. App. 406. Second, the abstract we have been provided reflects that a CD containing a portion of the police interview with Pledger was played in open court; yet there is no copy of the CD in the addendum as required by our rules. Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8) requires that an appellants brief include an addendum consisting of all documents essential to this courts resolution of the issues on appeal, including exhibits such as CDs and DVDs. Pursuant to Rule 4-2(b)(3), we afford Pledgers counsel an opportunity to cure these deficiencies. Counsel is directed to file a substituted abstract, brief, and addendum within fifteen days from the date of this opinion. Before doing so, we strongly encourage counsel to carefully review the rules to ensure that no other deficiencies exist. Rebriefing ordered; motion to withdraw denied. GLADWIN, C.J., and HIXSON, J., agree. Phillip A. McGough, P.A., by: Phillip A. McGough, for appellant. Dustin McDaniel, Atty Gen., by: Nicana C. Sherman, Asst Atty Gen., for appellee. 2
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.