Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 242 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. E12-1007 SUSAN HASSON APPELLANT V. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES APPELLEE BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge The issue is whether we should reverse the Board of Review’s decision that required Susan Hasson to repay unemployment benefits because of fraudulent or non-fraudulent overpayment under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-532(a)–(b) (Supp. 2011). The Board’s decision did not sufficiently explain how it determined that Hasson had to pay back certain unemployment benefits. Ferren v. Dir., Emp’t Sec. Dep’t, 59 Ark. App. 213, 215, 956 S.W.2d 198, 199 (1997). Because we cannot tell how the Board determined the amount of overpayment in its September 2012 decision, we cannot adequately review the amount of overpayment. Therefore, a remand for further findings is required. We have also considered Hasson’s motion for additional relief, and that motion is denied. Remanded for further findings; motion denied. G RUBER and BROWN, JJ., agree. Susan Hasson, pro se appellant. Phyllis Edwards, Associate General Department of Workforce Services. Opinion Delivered April 17, 2013 APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS BOARD OF REVIEW [NO. 2012-BR-00859] REMANDED FOR FURTHER FINDINGS; MOTION DENIED Counsel for Artee Williams, Director,
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.