Court of Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

Cite as 2012 Ark. App. 656 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CACR12-572 JUSTIN WILLIAMS Opinion Delivered November 14, 2012 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR 2008-375] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE GRAHAM APPELLEE PARTLOW, JUDGE REVERSED AND REMANDED RITA W. GRUBER, Judge Appellant, Justin Williams, contends that the Crittenden County Circuit Court erred by revoking his probation without correcting his illegal probationary sentence. He asserts that the illegal sentence and revocation were void and that the circuit courts decision should be reversed. The State concedes that the circuit court erred in revoking probation without correcting the original sentence, but it asserts that the case should be remanded for resentencing. We agree with the State. A July 20, 2009 judgment and disposition order reflects that Williams entered a negotiated plea of guilty to aggravated residential robbery, a Class Y felony under Ark. Code Ann. section 5-39-204(b) (Supp. 2007), for which he was placed on seventy-two months probation. On March 18, 2010, the State filed a petition to revoke. The court revoked probation at the conclusion of a revocation hearing and on May 24, 2012, entered an order
Cite as 2012 Ark. App. 656 sentencing Williams to seventy-two months imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. A person convicted of a Class Y felony shall receive a determinate sentence of not less than ten and not more than forty years, or life. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-401(a)(1) (Repl. 2006). Probation is not an authorized disposition for a Class Y felony except to the extent that section 5-4-104(c) (Repl. 2006) allows suspended imposition of an additional term of imprisonment. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-301(a)(1)(C) (Repl. 2006) (emphasis added). Williamss underlying sentence of probation was illegal, making his probationary sentence and the revocation proceeding void. Crouse v. State, 2012 Ark. App. 58. We reverse and dismiss the revocation, and we remand the case to the circuit court for sentencing as authorized by statute. Reversed and remanded. GLADWIN and GLOVER, JJ., agree. C. Brian Williams, for appellant. Dustin McDaniel, Atty Gen., by: Jake H. Jones, Asst Atty Gen., for appellee. 2
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.