Cite as 2012 Ark. App. 303 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CACR11-18 Opinion Delivered May 2, 2012 APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN ANTHONY DEWAYNE PRICE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FORT APPELLANT SMITH DISTRICT [NO. CR-2003-1320] V. HONORABLE JAMES O. COX, JUDGE STATE OF ARKANSAS AFFIRMED; MOTION TO APPELLEE WITHDRAW GRANTED JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Judge This is the third iteration of a no-merit appeal from the circuit court’s revocation of the suspended imposition of sentences of appellant, Anthony Dewayne Price. 1 Counsel for Price has again filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that this appeal is wholly without merit and has also filed a brief containing an argument section that lists all rulings adverse to Price made by the circuit court with an explanation as to why each adverse ruling is not a meritorious ground for reversal. Price was provided with a copy of his counsel’s brief and notified of his right to file a list of pro se points within thirty days, but he has not filed any points. After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we hold that counsel has filed a 1 We ordered rebriefing, denied a motion to withdraw, and remanded to settle and supplement the record in Price v. State, 2011 Ark. App. 465, and we ordered rebriefing and denied a motion to withdraw in Price v. State, 2012 Ark. App. 33.
Cite as 2012 Ark. App. 303 complying no-merit brief and conclude that the appeal is without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(k) (2011). Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm. Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted. GRUBER and GLOVER, JJ., agree. David L. Dunagin, for appellant. No response. 2
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.