Cite as 2011 Ark. App. 625 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CACR10-704 Opinion Delivered OCTOBER 26, 2011 ELEA LEE MURRAY III APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-2007-1103] V. HONORABLE DAVID N. LASER, JUDGE STATE OF ARKANSAS AFFIRMED; MOTION TO APPELLEE WITHDRAW GRANTED JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Judge This court ordered rebriefing in Murray v. State, 2011 Ark. App. 431, wherein the court recounted this case’s procedural history and explained why counsel’s brief failed to satisfy the requirements for an appeal in which counsel asserted that the appeal was without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4–3(k). Counsel now has filed a new, no-merit brief. The clerk of this court furnished the new brief to appellant and notified him of his right to file pro se points for reversal within thirty days. Appellant did not do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we hold that counsel has filed a complying no-merit brief and conclude that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant the motion filed by counsel to withdraw and affirm. Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted. GRUBER and BROWN, JJ., agree. Shaun Hair, Deputy Pub. Defender, for appellant. No response.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.