Cite as 2011 Ark. App. 627 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CACR11-332 Opinion Delivered October 26, 2011 RAYMOND JOHNSON APPEAL FROM THE UNION APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, [NO. CR 2006-675-1 and 2006-821-1-1] V. HONORABLE HAMILTON H. SINGLETON, JUDGE STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTATION OF RECORD AND REBRIEFING ORDERED ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Judge Appellant Raymond Johnson’s suspended sentences were revoked in Union County Circuit Court on January 18, 2011, when the trial court found that he had violated the terms and conditions of his suspended sentences. On appeal, he contends that the State failed to introduce substantial evidence that he committed a criminal offense punishable by incarceration. We order supplementation of the record and rebriefing. Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4–2(a)(8) (2011) requires that an appellant’s brief include an addendum consisting of all documents essential to the appellate court’s resolution of the issues on appeal. Because appellant has not included the judgment and commitment orders related to his suspended sentences in his addendum, we order him to correct this deficiency by filing a supplemental addendum within seven calendar days from the date of this
Cite as 2011 Ark. App. 627 opinion. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4–2(b)(4) (2011); see In re Ark. Supreme Court & Court of Appeals Rule 4–2(b), 2011 Ark. 141 (per curiam). Further, our review of the record reveals that the judgment and commitment orders are not contained therein. The addendum shall not contain any document or material that is not in the record. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4–2(a)(8). However, we can sua sponte direct parties to supply any omitted material by filing a certified, supplemental record. Ark. R. App. P.–Civ. 6(e) (2011) (as made applicable to criminal cases by Ark. R. App. P. Crim. 4(a) (2011)). Thus, we direct appellant to supplement the record with the necessary judgment and commitment orders and to file a supplemental record with our clerk’s office within seven calendar days. Supplementation of record and rebriefing ordered. VAUGHT, C.J., and MARTIN, J., agree. Gary J. Barrett, for appellant. Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Nicana C. Sherman, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee. 2
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.