ARK. APP.] HOUSTON V. STATE 167 Cite as 43 Ark. App. 167 (1993) Beatrice HOUSTON v. STATE of Arkansas CA CR 92-653 862 S.W.2d 292 Court of Appeals of Arkansas En Banc
Opinion delivered October 13, 1993 ATTORNEY & CLIENT — MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES — ABSENT GOOD CAUSE, MOTIONS FILED MORE THAN SIXTY DAYS AFTER MANDATE WILL BE DENIED. — Motions for attorney's fee should be filed in the appellate court in time for them to be considered at the time the case is considered on its merits; hereafter, if no good cause for delay in filing the motion is presented, motions for attorney's fees filed more than sixty (60) days after the mandate issues will be denied. Motion for Attorney's Fees denied. James H. Phillips, for appellant. No response. PER CURIAM. On February 24, 1993, we affirmed appellant's
168 HOUSTON V. STATE [43 Cite as 43 Ark. App. 167 (1993) conviction of delivery of controlled substance. Houston v. State, 41 Ark. App. 67, 848 S.W.2d 430 (1993). On September 23, 1993, appellant's attorney filed this motion for attorney's fees. We deny the motion. [1] A two-month delay between rendition of our decision and the motion for attorney's fees prompted us in 1982 to advise the bar that motions for attorney's fee should be filed in this court in time for them to be considered at the time the case is considered on its merits. Cristee v. State, 8 Ark. App. 33, 627 S.W.2d 38 (1982). We explained in Cristee that when motions for fees are delayed we are required to obtain and reconsider the briefs in order to determine the fees. Id. A three-month delay prompted a similar explanation in Stefanovich v. State, 10 Ark. App. 233, 662 S.W.2d 476 (1984). Our request that motions for attorney's fees be filed so that we can consider them at the time the case was decided was, in Stefa-novich, coupled with a warning that failure to do so could prevent an allowance or attorney's fee. Id. Although we granted attorney's fees in both Cristee and Stefanovich, in Fiveash v. State, 12 Ark. App. 391, 676 S.W.2d 769 (1984), we denied a motion for attorney's fees filed eight months after our decision was rendered. In Scott v. State, 28 Ark. App. 329, 775 S.W.2d 513 (1989), we granted a motion for attorney's fees filed four months after our decision was rendered, and repeated the warnings in Fiveash, Stefanovich, and Cristee, supra. In Terrell v. State, 32 Ark. App. 58,796 S.W.2d 348 (1990), we denied a motion for attorney's fees filed over eight months after our decision was rendered. In that per curiam opinion, we reviewed our prior warnings about filing motions for attorney's fees promptly and repeated the explanation for this requirement. In Williams v. State, 42 Ark. App. 184, 854 S.W.2d 370 (1993), we denied a motion for attorney's fees filed approximately seven months following issuance of our mandate. This opinion is being published as notice to the bar that hereafter, if no good cause for delay in filing the motion is presented, we will deny motions for attorney's fees filed more than
ARK. APP.] 169 sixty (60) days after our mandate issues. The motion for attorney's fees is denied.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.