ARK. App .] TIMMS V. EVERETT, DIRECTOR 163 Cite as 6 Ark. App. 163 (1982) David TIMMS v. William F. EVERETT, Director of Labor, and THE TALLEY CORP. E 82-113 639 S.W.2d 368 Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 22, 1982 1. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION — DISQUALIFICATION FOR BENEFITS — EXCEPTION. — An individual is disqualified for benefits if he voluntarily and without good cause connected with the work, left his last work, but no individual is disqualified if, after making reasonable efforts to preserve his job rights, he left his last work due to a personal emergency of such nature and compelling urgency that it would be contrary to good conscience to impose a disqualification. [Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1106 (a).] 2. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION — PERSONAL EMERGENCY. — Where the claimant's pregnant wife, after a fall, asked claimant to come home from California where he was working because she was afraid she might have injured the baby and there was no one else to care for her, the claimant had a personal emergency that met the statutory requirements. 3. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION — WEIGHT OF APPELLANT'S
164 TIMMS v. EVERETT, DIRECTOR [6 Cite as 6 Ark. App. 163 (1982) TESTIMONY. — Even though appellant was the only witness at the hearing, the testimony of a party cannot be taken as undisputed; however, such testimony cannot be arbitrarily disregarded; there must be some basis for disbelieving it. 4. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION — NO MEDICAL PROOF OF PERSONAL EMERGENCY REQUIRED. — Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1106 (a) does not require an individual to offer medical proof of a personal emergency to his employer; it requires the individual to make reasonable efforts to preserve his job rights. 5. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION — PRESERVATION OF JOB RIGHTS. — An individual may preserve his job rights by requesting a leave of absence from his employer. Appeal from Arkansas Employment Security Division; reversed and remanded. Appellant, pro se. Alinda Andrews, for appellees. DONALD L. CORBIN, Judge. Claimant, David Timms, was found ineligible for unemployment benefits because he voluntarily left his last work wi thou t good rause connected with the work. We reverse and remand. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1106 (a) provides in part as follows: [A]n individual shall be disqualified for benefits . . . [i]f he voluntarily and without good cause connected with work, left his last work. Provided no individual shall be disqualified under this subsection if, after making reasonable efforts to preserve his job rights, he left his last work due to a personal emergency of such nature and compelling urgency that it would be contrary to good conscience to impose a disqualification; . . . . Claimant was employed as a machinist with the Talley Corporation in Newbury Park, California, making $6.50 per hour. Claimant's wife was pregnant bu¢ planned to leave Arkansas to join claimant in California. Claimant testified that his wife fell and asked him to come home because she
ARK. APP.] TIMMS V. EVERETT, DIRECTOR 165 Cite as 6 Ark. App. 163 (1982) was afraid she might have injured the baby. In his written claim for benefits, claimant stated that there was no one to take care of his wife. Claimant asked his employer for a leave of absence but was informed that it could not be granted in less than two weeks after application was made. He then quit and returned to Arkansas. "Even though appellant was the only witness at the hearing, the testimony of a party cannot be taken as undisputed. However, such testimony cannot be arbitrarily disregarded; there must be some basis for disbelieving it." Butler v. Director of Labor, 3 Ark. App. 229, 624 S.W.2d 448 (1981). We find nothing in the record to refute claimant's contention that he was faced with a personal emergency of such nature and compelling urgency that it would be contrary to good conscience to impose a disqualification. In its decision, the Board of Review made a finding that claimant had not furnished the employer with a medical statement concerning the necessity of his return to Arkansas. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1106 (a) does not require an individual to offer medical proof of a personal emergency to his employer; it requires the individual to make reasonable efforts to preserve his job rights. This court has held that an individual may preserve his job rights by requesting a leave of absence from his employer. Valentine v. Barnes, 1 Ark. App. 308, 615 S.W.2d 386 (1981), Morse v. Daniels, 271 Ark. 402, 609 S.W.2d 80 (1980), Turner v. Daniels, 270 Ark. 418, 605 S.W.2d 465 (1980). We reverse and remand with directions to award benefits.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.